Melchizedek
Typological treatment in the corpus
Melchizedek, the mysterious king-priest of Salem in Gen. 14, is identified in the corpus by both Noordzij and Warnock as a type of Christ. His threefold identity — king, priest, and son of God — and his absence of earthly descent constitute for Noordzij a prophetic foreshadowing of the office-structure that Christ fulfils.
Biblical anchoring
| Reference | Context |
|---|---|
| Gen. 14:18-20 | Melchizedek meets Abram, brings bread and wine, receives tithes |
| Ps. 110:4 | ”You are a priest forever, after the order of Melchizedek” |
| Heb. 7:1-3 | ”Without father or mother or genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but resembling the Son of God” |
| Heb. 7:15-17 | Christ as priest after the order of Melchizedek, by the power of an indestructible life |
| Heb. 6:20 | Jesus entered as a forerunner as high priest after the order of Melchizedek |
Typological exposition by author
Noordzij
In The Inheritance of Jabez (EJ), Noordzij develops his Christology through the figure of Melchizedek as a type of Christ. Melchizedek’s distinctive characteristic is his absence of earthly genealogy — a typological datum pointing to heavenly origin:
“Of Melchizedek… he was ‘without father or mother or genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but resembling the Son of God’ (Heb. 7:3). He was ‘king of Salem and priest of God Most High’ (Gen. 14:18-20). He was king and priest and son of God (Heb. 7:1-2). His origin was heavenly and of an indestructible life (Heb. 7:16).”1
For Noordzij this is not a doctrinal subtlety but a prophetic foreshadowing: Melchizedek’s threefold identity anticipates precisely the office-structure that Christ fulfils as high priest, king, and only-begotten Son. The connection with the sonship theme is direct — what Christ is, the believer is called to become: priest and king after the order of Melchizedek. The church as “priestly-kingly people” stands over against the institutional congregation that derives its validity from earthly lineage rather than heavenly origin.2
Warnock
In The Feast of Tabernacles (FOT), Warnock places the order of Melchizedek in the context of the end of days, when the Aaronic priesthood must yield to a new one:
“The Aaronic priesthood — glorious as it was in its day — must give way to a new priesthood, the priesthood after the ‘order of Melchizedek’ (Heb. 6:20).”3
For Warnock the transition from Aaron to Melchizedek signals the transition from the Pentecost age to the Feast of Tabernacles age: the priest who derives his authority from institutional lineage (Aaron) ultimately gives way to the priest-son whose power proceeds from an indestructible life (Melchizedek/Christ).
Related types
- Connected: saul (as contrasting type: self-willed kingship versus priestly-kingly sonship)
- Via glossary: sonship
Footnotes
Footnotes
-
Noordzij, b4 (The Inheritance of Jabez), Christology chapter — Melchizedek as a Christological type. ↩
-
Noordzij, b4 (The Inheritance of Jabez), Ecclesiology chapter — the priestly-kingly congregation versus the Ichabod congregation. ↩
-
Warnock, b1 (The Feast of Tabernacles, 1951), chapter on the new priesthood. ↩